I
never did get a bill for the ambulance ride home.
So
what do cyclocross racing, software engineers, data collection, education
policy, and immovable objects in the form of telephone poles have to do with
each other? Well I’ll tell ya…
Sara
and I have just returned from the Young Adult Literature Association’s symposium
in Austin Texas. Generally I love Austin, good food, funky town, warm weather, great
place to ride a bike, All were true this time except for the weather –
freakishly cold – but still better than the blizzard we left behind us in Ohio.
It
was at a dinner thrown by Sylvia Vardell and Janet Wong – publishers of the
Poetry Friday Anthology series that the germ for this blog was first
conjugated.
First: Cyclocross.
Cyclocross
is a form of off road bicycle racing that is kind of like a steeplechase on
wheels. There are obstacles that one
must dismount their bike and hop over, sand pits, sets of steps etc. My son
Frank and I have taken it up this season – a season that runs from the Autumn into
the Winter. It’s a raucous sport that encourages heckling and cowbells from
fans as well as beer and food. It’s the rugby of bicycle racing in my opinion.
Okay,
Frank and I are doing a little training – we’ve set up a course that shares two
parks about a mile apart – we complete a circuitous course around one park then
book like mad down the sidewalks to the second park, run that course and then
back again for a predetermined amount of laps. Between the two locations we get
a pretty good rehearsal for what we might be encountering on race day.
As
we add up the laps though, Frank adds to his lead on me. By our final lap he is
around a quarter mile ahead of me or so. I bear down, stand up on my pedals and
hope he doesn’t notice my sprinting behind him. I have an idea of my threshold
exertion and I stare at my Garmin GPS device on my handlebars. I note speed,
rpm, and time. I want to exert the most effort I can without bonking and try to
close the gap that my wiry son has opened between us.
It
was while I was collecting this data that I did not notice the singular
telephone pole that was edged 8 inches more into the sidewalk than the rest of
the domino line down the street. Rather,
I didn’t notice it until I hit it dead on with my left shoulder at full speed.
I spun off my bike twirling like a boomerang into oncoming traffic. The air
whooshed out collapsing my lungs like an empty toothpaste tube. I dizzily
rolled myself out of the street onto a nearby tree lawn staring up in the sky
and waited for the pain to come raining down new year’s eve confetti style.
Which, it did.
I’ve often relied on the kindness of
strangers:
Fortunately
some concerned citizens stopped to assist me and called the ambulance. I
remembered every detail of the accident, so I knew that I most likely didn’t
have a concussion. Frank had circled back and looked on with concern as the paramedics
checked me out. I didn’t seem to have any broken bones and my pupils looked
fine so the EMS team gave me a ride home and Frank wheeled my bike home like a
combat solder helping a comrade off the battlefield. I have since made almost a
full recovery and even went on to race three days after the accident. But what
I really want to talk about is education policy.
My
mistake on this ride was paying too close attention to the immediate data in
front of me and not looking up to see what was coming down the road. This is, I believe, the same mistake our high
stakes test driven education scheme is taking. We miss what is coming down the
road in the long run when we teach to the test, to the point where in some
districts a 4th grader can expect to spend over a quarter of their
learning time just taking tests. We’ve
got our kids heads buried down and pedaling as fast as they can blind to real
world obstacles to success. We swap out
short term graphing of test results for real critical thinking skills.
Context is everything:
Why?
Software engineers (see this is all coming together now.) and one in
particular, Bill Gates. His billions of dollars have way too big an influence
on what is happening in our public schools. He was one of the loudest voices in
the smaller school campaign – the one that busted large schools into smaller
entities –oftentimes in the same building. Well, this idea crashed and burned in
the end. Gates himself has admitted as much. So you’d think we would have
learned from the lesson of taking education advice from non-educators? No way.
Now
the money is flowing into test taking, data collection, and private enterprise charter
schools – sounds more like a computer corporation than a school right? That’s because data-collecting systems is
what software engineers know – and when trying to solve a problem one will go
to what they know right? Unfortunately what one knows is not always applicable
to the task at hand.
Knowing
my exact speed, rpm, watts exerted did nothing to keep me from popping like a
water balloon against a utility pole. Data collection was not the route to
success for me at that time. Now, had I collected the data and used it later as
part of a training program instead of my sole focus during the process I might
not be waking up as stiff recent mornings.
Similarly
– how do you think a software writer might feel about me asking him or her to
go back and rewrite the code for that skyscraper’s climate control system with
an eye more toward character development and foreshadowing? Right tools for the right job.
Just
because a guy made billions in business doesn’t mean he should have a seat at
the head of the table when education policy is being discussed. Kids are not
lines of code and I think the there are a lot of folks messing with education
policy that need to get their heads out of their – well lets just say they need
to look up.